A Probabilistic Proof of Wallis's Formula for π

نویسنده

  • Steven J. Miller
چکیده

There are many beautiful formulas for π (see for example [4]). The purpose of this note is to introduce an alternate derivation of Wallis’s product formula, equation (1), which could be covered in a first course on probability, statistics, or number theory. We quickly review other famous formulas for π, recall some needed facts from probability, and then derive Wallis’s formula. We conclude by combining some of the other famous formulas with Wallis’s formula to derive an interesting expression for log(π/2) (equation (5)). Often in a first-year calculus course students encounter the Gregory-Leibniz formula, π

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluating the Probability Integral Using Wallis's Product Formula for π

By “straightforward” we mean that it can be presented in a standard one-variable calculus course. This is not the first time an “elementary” proof of this identity has been given. Several other proofs can be found in, e.g., [1], [3], [4], [5], [7]. Most of them are variations on a theme (double integral, gamma function, . . . ). This one is a simplification of one of the most recent ones by Lor...

متن کامل

Characterisations of Testing Preorders for a Finite Probabilistic pi-Calculus

We consider two characterisations of the may and must testing preorders for a probabilistic extension of the finite π-calculus: one based on notions of probabilistic weak simulations, and the other on a probabilistic extension of a fragment of Milner-Parrow-Walker modal logic for the π-calculus. We base our notions of simulations on the similar concepts used in previous work for probabilistic C...

متن کامل

Every super-polynomial proof in purely implicational minimal logic has a polynomially sized proof in classical implicational propositional logic

In this note we show how any formula δ with a proof of super-polynomial size in M→ has a poly-sized proof in K→ . This fact entails that any propositional classical tautology has short proofs, i.e., NP=CoNP. 1 Every classical tautology has short proofs This article reports the results on the investigation on the existence of short proofs for every Classical Propositional Logic tautology. Firstl...

متن کامل

Lecture 2: Probabilistically Checkable Proofs and the Long Code 1 Probabilistically checkable proofs

A language L is in NP if there is a Turing machine which can verify, in polynomial time, if a string x is in L, given that the Turing machine is provided with a good “witness string” w. Hence, NP can be viewed as the class of languages which have an interactive proof system in which there is a polynomial time verifier V (Turing machine) and an infinitely powerful prover P (an oracle) who, on in...

متن کامل

On the Regular Emptiness Problem of Subzero Automata

In the fundamental paper [5] Rabin proved that the monadic second order logic (MSO) of the full binary tree is decidable using the automata method. This proof technique can be roughly described as follows: (1) an appropriate notion of tree automaton is defined; (2) every formula φ of the MSO logic is effectively associated to an automaton Aφ such that that φ is true if and only if Aφ accepts a ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The American Mathematical Monthly

دوره 115  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008